The George Zimmerman show trial

This sordid episode in American history had nothing to do with justice.  It was a modern day witch hunt where a man's life and reputation were nearly destroyed by unscrupulous government officials whose only concern was the craven pandering of minority votes.

RS - the death of justice

It would be nice to think we have put this travesty behind us, but the simple fact that it happened should worry and shame all Americans. This is a severe blow to the rule of law.


AG Holder uses power of the US government to attack an innocent man

Eric Holder and Barack Obama are racists. Pure and simple. Zimmerman was acquitted and, if the Fifth Amendment means anything these days, the Administration needs to stop this witch hunt immediately. If this is just political grandstanding (throwing a bone to the blacks to mollify them after the gay marriage and amnesty rifts) then it is reprehensible. If they actually think they can bring civil rights charges against a private citizen who was simply defending himself then they are a clear and present danger to our constitution and America and should be removed from office immediately.

Will no one rid me of this turbulent neighborhood watchman?

Unethical prosecutor calls Zimmerman a murdered after he was acquitted

I think Angela Corey may have violated George Zimmerman's civil rights....again.
Let's face it. Corey made the decision to prosecute for political reasons; not because the evidence supported it. This was a politically motivated witch hunt that was bound to fail from the start. Now that the Zimmerman has been vindicated the prosecutors aren't going to do the honorable thing and admit that they didn't have the evidence to support the charges. No. Like petulant children who couldn't even win when the game was rigged, they are going to blame everybody else and refuse to accept the truth. Like Mike Nifong, the disgraced Durham County DA who pursued rape charges against the Duke lacrosse players for political motivations, Corey should be removed from office and disbarred. She clearly violated the law by withholding evidence from the defense and her behavior was demonstrably unethical.


Facebook is evidently OK with a 'Kill Zimmerman' page

Facebook, YouTube and Twitter all have a rather revolting history of censoring and taking down conservative pages/accounts while tolerating those of leftists and terrorists. It practically takes an act of Congress to get YouTube to take down pro-al Qaeda videos, yet the most innocuous content from conservatives gets pulled at the first complaint from some liberal troll. It's not hard to see why that is the case. Political donations from employees of companies like FaceBook, Twitter and You Tube/Google run over ten to one for Democrats. They are companies run by liberals; employees, management and ownership. Hey, it's their company, so they can do as they see fit. It is just instructive to see the fascist tendencies so often displayed by liberals. They talk a good game about tolerance, free speech and diversity, but it is a one way street. They only tolerate liberal opinions. They do everything in their power, legal or not, to silence the opposition. That should tell you all you need to know about liberals. They don't want to debate issues unless they control the terms and language of the debate. They have to do this since their position cannot be supported by logic and fact. In order for them to achieve their goals they must lie, hide their agenda in emotional appeals to base emotions, attack the character of their opponents and use (abuse) the power of government and the institutions that they control to silence dissent.


Media mislead on 'stand your ground' in Zimmerman trial

Just as Sandy Hook was used to advance an agenda, so is the Zimmerman trial. This isn't 'for the children' or about 'justice' it is just the left using the news media to lie to the public in order to achieve political objectives. The left doesn't like people who are self-reliant and who are willing to defend themselves. They want everybody to be dependent on the government for even the most basic needs. Your life is in danger- don't use a gun to protect yourself; call the police. That's the liberal way. It is all about the primacy of the government. Everybody must be dependent on the government. And if you have the temerity to actually use a gun to defend yourself, well then the government might just charge you with murder.


AG Holder uses Zimmerman trial as justification for attacks on 'stand your ground' laws

And now we have the real reason AG Holder is contemplating violation of George Zimmerman's 5th Amendment rights. This is the administration's goal; attacking the "stand your ground" legal protection guaranteed citizens of thirty free states. Holder is a Marxist and he doesn't like the idea of self-sufficient citizens being able to defend themselves. Like a good Marxist, Holder wants everybody to be completely dependent on government for everything, including their own safety and protection. Just as Holder and Obama stood on the graves of the Sandy Hook shooting victims in their crass politicking for gun control, Holder is capitalizing on media-manufactured public outrage to advance an attack on stand your ground laws. Disgusting. 

The mainstream news media has quite a double standard when it comes to reporting on crimes where blacks victimize whites.

Hispanic anti-Zimmerman protester beaten down by blacks

Racist blacks beat down and rob an Hispanic anti-Zimmerman protester. Well, of course that's a hate crime. His civil rights were violated. We must have a public show trial to appease Hispanic voters. What???? The news media isn't interested? Attorney General Holder isn't speaking out about this hate crime? The DoJ isn't busing protesters in to riot, emmmm, errrr, ah mostly peacefully protest this? Why? Double standard? Hypocrisy? Maybe it doesn't fit the white oppression narrative of the news media when blacks beat Hispanics?


Attack by black mob ignored by media

Did the news media see any racism here? Do you think Rev. Al is heading to Baltimore to lead a march against racism? If Obama had a son, would he look like the waiter........or the attacking mob?
There are serious questions of race that need to be discussed. Unfortunately the liberals and the news media (same thing) don't want to discuss anything honestly. They would rather have us believe that we are still living in 1959. You know, back when Democrats were passing Jim Crow laws and filling the ranks of the Klan.

It is time to honestly address the issue of race in America.......but the media won't do it

The media doesn't seem to be as worked up by this as they were with Zimmerman

So, If Obama had a son would they look like these reprobates? Do you think our wondrous, post-racial president is going to jump into this issue as he did with the Martin/Zimmerman case? Anybody? Ferris. Ferris?


Time for the honest conversation on race

Yes, it is time to have an HONEST discussion of race in America. An honest, logical conversation where we discuss the same standards and laws being applied to all races. Redress of past wrongs through racist 'solutions' is illogical and wrong and does not, in any way, equate to justice. It is merely retribution and revenge.


It's raaaaaacist!

The truth seems to be a somewhat foreign concept to those who use racial animosity to further their agenda.


The Allen West Corollary 

Can someone tell me why the news media goes to Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton when they want a spokesman for the black community? There are more than a few people like Allen West who are far better qualified than those race baiting hacks. The problem is that the news media won't go to them because they are self-reliant, successful people who refuse to blame others for their problems. It just doesn't fit the liberal race narrative.